Followers

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Eko 2012: Whizkid, Wande Cole, others to thrill at closing ceremony

The opening ceremony of Eko 2012 was, no doubt, a spectacular show of culture, music and dance. The exhilarating performances of Nigerian musical stars like Banky W and the ‘exhumation’ of musical legend, the iconic Fela Anikulapo Kuti will remain indelible in the minds of many.

Whizkid


The curtains for the Sports Festival will fall this weekend and organizers are not leaving anything to chance in their determination to give the world a closing ceremony that would last the test of time.

Secretary of the Local Organising Committee, Kweku Tandoh has said the closing ceremony will be a spectacular celebration of Lagos culture.

In a chat with Sports Vanguard, the scribe revealed, “the closing ceremony of such event is usually a bit more carefree in terms of it being more fun, more of a party and more of a carnival-like atmosphere.”

He continued, “the LOC is putting together a closing ceremony that would remain in the minds of Nigerians and even the rest of the world. All I can say for now is that we are going to have a lot of musical acts like Whizzkid, Wande Cole and efforts are being made to get one or two others that would be added.”

He said even before the official closing ceremony starts at about 6pm, the gates would be thrown open about 2pm and between that time and 6pm there will be a lot of entertainment and musical shows. Naturally, a lot fireworks will end the show.







Source: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2012/12/eko-2012-whizkid-wande-cole-others-to-thrill-at-closing-ceremony/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Nigeria still ranked one of the most corrupt countries


The latest ranking of Nigeria on the corruption scale released by Transparency International returned another grim verdict: Nigeria is still a nation of sleaze and graft, one of the most corrupt nations in the world. With a score of 27 out of a possible 100, Nigeria occupied 139th position on the corruption table, in the same league with Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Kenya and Nepal, indicating that the country has not shown any major improvement in its poor reputation. Last year, Nigeria was 143rd on the scale.

In all, 176 countries came under the purview of the index this
Ibrahim Lamorde: Nothing to cheer
 year, with Ghana scoring 45 and being ranked 64th, an improvement on its position last year, when it ranked 69.

Botswana is the least corrupt country on the continent,scoring 65 and ranking first in Africa and 30th globally.

There are five other African nations, such as Seycheles, Namibia,Mauritius, Cape Verde and Rwanda ahead of Ghana.

South Africa fared worse than Ghana. It is 69th.
Denmark, Finland, and New Zealand shared first place in the 2012 rankings as the world’s least corrupt countries. Last year, New Zealand took first place and Denmark and Finland shared second place.

Not much changed at the bottom of the rankings either. Somalia, Afghanistan, and North Korea all tied for 174th, or last place, in this year’s rankings. North Korea and Somalia tied for last place in 2011, and Afghanistan was in the bottom five.

The Berlin-based anti-corruption group’s annual survey has become a go-to source for scoring the level of graft and bribery in most of the world’s countries. The rankings’ neat format make them an accessible benchmark for the anti-corruption community. Journalists regularly cite the index, and companies factor it in when weighing investment in a foreign country.

The rankings are an aggregate of a handful of corruption indexes. This year’s rankings drew from 13 indexes compiled over the last year. This is a change from previous years when the rankings used data pulled from a longer period than just the previous year.

TI always cautions against year-over-year comparisons, and did so this year, but said that because of the new methodology, year-to-year comparisons would be possible in future. The group said the change in methodology came after a “rigorous review.”

In the 2012 index, two-thirds of the 176 countries ranked scored below 50, on a scale from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to be very clean).

The U.S. fared slightly better this year, coming in at 19th with a score of 73, down from 24th place last year.

“After a year of focus on corruption, we expect governments to take a tougher stance against the abuse of power,” TI Chair Huguette Labelle said in a news release. “The Corruption Perceptions Index 2012 results demonstrate that societies continue to pay the high cost of corruption.”

Meanwhile, the Nigeria Economic Summit Group in Abuja has described the latest Transparency International (TI) index report on Nigeria as `a wakeup call’ to the fight against corruption.

Mr Frank Nweke, the Director-General, NESG said: “this figure merely serves to remind us that we need to keep working on the issue of corruption in the public and private sector.

“Even if we are ranked 20th out of 176, I still feel that government must continue to redouble its efforts to really address these issues,’’ he said.

Nweke made the comment at a news conference to mark the end of the 18th summit of the Nigeria Economic Summit.

Earlier, Mr Folusho Philips, the Chairman of the NESG, was asked to assess Nigeria’s government fight against corruption in the light of the latest TI report.

In his response, Philips said: “all I can say is that there is a due process for pursuing issues about corruption.

“Where people have been identified and government agencies such as the EFCC and the Court has confirmed and charged them, due process normally follows.

“Before then one has to be very careful on how to come to conclusion to talk about the level of corruption in Nigeria, ’’ he said.

Earlier in his remarks during a panel discussion for financial regulators at the summit, the Central Bank Governor, Malam Sansui Lamido Sanusi, said no country was immune to corruption.

“The greatest challenge facing Nigeria is the challenge of a people that have lost sight of the importance of merit and not corruption.

“If you go to China they steal money, in Malaysia there is corruption and why don’t we hear about it?

“It is because every day, these countries are developing, if you go to the hospitals, the doctors know their jobs, you go to the school, the teacher is qualified.

“If you are running a bank, a regulatory agency or a minister, there is merit,’’ he said.

Sansui, however, expressed dismay that in Nigeria, issues of tribalism, religion and nepotism had relegated merit to the background.










Source: http://pmnewsnigeria.com/2012/12/05/nigeria-still-ranked-one-of-the-most-corrupt-countries/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PmNewsNigeria+%28PM+News+Nigeria%29

I acted in accordance with the Constitution, Jonathan tells court

ABUJA — President Goodluck Jonathan, yesterday, justified the actions he took regarding the removal of the embattled President of the Court of Appeal, PCA, Justice Isa Ayo Salami, from office, insisting that he acted in accordance with the 1999 constitution as amended.

Jonathan stated this on a day he urged Justice Adamu Bello of a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja to dismiss a suit entered against him by 11 legal practitioners under the aegis of the Registered Trustees of Centre for the Promotion of Arbitration.
Justice Isa Ayo Salami and President Goodluck Jonathan
Addressing the court through his lawyer, Mr. Matthew Echo, President Jonathan, alongside the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke, SAN, yesterday, maintained that the plaintiffs “do not have the locus standi to commence and/or maintain this action and seek the reliefs endorsed in the motion on notice dated July 2, 2012, as they do not have sufficient interest in the matter to which the application relates.”

It would be recalled that the plaintiffs had in their suit, sought “an order of court directing the 3rd Defendant, National Judicial Council, NJC, to recall the 4th Defendant, Salami, to resume his duties as the President of the Court of Appeal forthwith.

“A declaration that the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria has no power whatsoever and/or howsoever to exercise disciplinary functions over the Justices of the Court of Appeal and/or Justice Isa Ayo Salami, the PCA.

“A declaration that the further reappointment and/ or approval of the extension of the tenure of the 5th Defendant (Justice Adamu) as the Acting PCA by the 1st Defendant (Jonathan), is unconstitutional, illegal, null and void.”

As well as, “An order restraining the 5th defendant from further acting as the President of the Court of Appeal.”

The plaintiffs equally urged the court to, among other things, determine: “whether the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, has any step to take within the provisions of sections 153 and 21 Third Schedule of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, in relation to the recall of Justice Salami as recommended by the NJC.”

Even as they prayed the court to go ahead and determine “whether the NJC’s three-man panel recommendation for the recall of Justice Salami has not put an end to all disputes in relation to his suspension/recall.”

Meanwhile, sequel to an oral application moved in court, yesterday, by counsel to the plaintiffs, Mr J. Akanike, Justice Bello struck out the name of the erstwhile Acting PCA, Justice Dalhatu Adamu, even as he adjourned till January 17, 2013, to enable all the parties in the matter to adopt their written addresses.

Justice Adamu’s name was expunged from the case owing to the fact that the NJC had already appointed Justice Zainab Bukachua to take over the affairs of the appellate court.

NJC, had in a written address it filed in support of the suit before the high court, argued that President Jonathan, was bereft of the constitutional powers to stop it from reinstating the suspended PCA, Justice Salami, just as it declared the re-appointment of Justice Adamu in his stead as illegal and unconstitutional.

According to NJC, “we submit that the exercise of disciplinary power and recall of a suspended Justice of the Court of Appeal is exclusively vested in the NJC by the constitution.

“By virtue of the combined provisions of sections 153, 158(1) of the constitution, and the NJC’s power to exercise disciplinary control over judicial officers contained in paragraph 21(1) of the part 1, third schedule of the constitution, the council is clothe with the power to suspend and recall the 4th Defendant (Salami) without any recourse to the president (the 1st Defendant).

“Section 158(1) of the constitution provides that “in exercising its power to make appointment or to exercise disciplinary control over persons…the NJC…, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or persons.

“The only instances the 3rd Defendant exercises its powers in conjunction with the President is in appointment and removal of judicial officers and do not extend to the 3rd Defendant’s disciplinary control over the judicial officers and reinstatement/ recalling of suspended judicial officers; these, we submit, are residual powers exercisable by the 3rd Defendant exclusively.

“My Lord, we therefore submit that it is within the constitutionally vested powers of the 3rd Defendant to recall/ reinstate the 4th Defendant as the President of the Court. We urge my lord to so hold and resolve this issue as argued in the plaintiffs’ favour.”







Source - Vanguard News

Boxing shocker for Nigeria


Former Boxing Association Chairman, David Johnson yesterday walked out of the boxing arena of the ongoing National Sports Festival, hissing, lamenting and even cursing over the poor standard of boxing , a sport that once counted for Nigeria in international outings.

The sport had, for long, taken a plunge in the country but Johnson expected to see some potentials and hoped that the challenge would be the ability to transform them.

Rashidi Fatai of Ogun State (red) and Chinedu Ani of Imo State fight in the boxing 81kg men semi finals bout.  Photo: Henry Unini
“I saw absolutely nothing. Everything was wrong about boxing and one felt like crying,” Johnson said, shaking the head in disappointment and using some harsh words to describe the events in boxing. He spoke further:

“First, the venue was not good enough. Using the gym as venue for a festival of this magnitude showed that officials and organisers lacked the depth to appreciate boxing. Then the boxers the states paraded were awful. I went to see boxing bouts but I did not see boxers.

The states are not helping matters in our sports development. And if the states can’t get it right, then we should all forget about developing sports in this country. It is the responsibility of the states to produce athletes before the national bodies will take over. And where the states are not producing, then there’s big problem.

The boxers I saw were not good at all. They were no boxers. They fought like people who were not coached at all.

They were wrongly selected and wrongly coached. It is a shame, a big one for a country that once had a future in the sport.

I also blame the media for not raising enough alarm on what is happening to boxing. Without the media we can not develop sports and the earlier our sports journalists realised this the better.

They are more interested in foreign news than what is happening here in our country.

For now, I count them as among those responsible for the plunge our sports, especially boxing, has taken. Boxing is dead inNigeria. It doesn’t exist anymore.Nigeriacan do better.”

Medal Table

State             Gold         Silver          Bronze         Total
Delta                42            36                36             104
Rivers              32            21                25                78
Lagos             18            18               30                56
Edo                  13             9                19                41
Bayelsa           13             7               12                32
Plateau            5              6                12                23
Ogun               4            11                15                30
Ondo                 4              5                  8                17
A/Ibom              3              8                  8                19
C/River             3              6                  6                15

…as at 7 p.m.







Source - Vanguard News

Igbo Presidency not feasible in 2015 – Junaid

ABUJA — As preparations for the next Presidential election gather momentum, the North has said it will not allow former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, to impose any candidate on the region and its people.

The North is still reeling under the pains of the ‘imposition’ of the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua on them in 2007 and the current President on Nigerians by the former Nigerian leader.

The Convener of the Coalition of Northern Leaders, Academics, Professionals and Businessmen, Dr. Junaid Mohammed, told Vanguard in an exclusive interview, yesterday, that the North had learnt it bitter lessons and would not allow Obasanjo to dictate to them any longer.

According to Mohammed, the people of the North do not believe that Obasanjo still has the necessary influence and power to champion their cause and will, therefore, not allow him to dabble into their political future.

The Second Republic lawmaker said those in the North, who believe that Obasanjo has what it takes to make them President, were merely deceiving themselves, as the former President’s era had since lapsed.
V
Reminded that Obasanjo still wields enormous influence and authority in the land given the number of men and women he put in commanding heights, Mohammed shrugged off such influence, saying the man could hardly win a ward election in his Ogun State.

He said: “We will not allow what happened in the election of Yar’Adua and Jonathan to happen again in 2015. We must rise as a people and carry our destiny in our hands.

“We will never allow somebody who does not have the interest of the people of the North to dabble into its politics in 2015.

“In any case, if Obasanjo cannot win a ward in his local government area of Ogun State, is it in Kano or Sokoto that his candidate can win?”

Obasanjo is a political liability to the North

The political commentator made it clear that those who were being bandied as Obasanjo’s candidates in the North should work hard and win the confidence of the people if they wanted to be elected rather than go to sleep with the erroneous impression that the former leader could guarantee them easy access to the Presidential Villa.

He said: “It appears to me that Obasanjo is more of a political liability to the North and anyone who puts his hope in him in 2015 is doing so at his/her own peril.

“The irony is that some uninformed persons still believe that Obasanjo has what it takes to put them in certain political offices inNigeria. That is not possible particularly in the North.”

The medical doctor-turned politician said the North would devise a more democratic means than zoning to elect its leaders in 2015 to heal the wounds of the past political mistakes and move the people of the region and Nigeria forward.

Igbo Presidency not feasible in 2015

Mohammed said Igbo Presidency would not be feasible in 2015 given the penchant of the people of the region to pull down their own rather than speak with one voice to achieve their set goal.

He maintained that Nigeria needed a leader who could pull it out of the present predicament and take the people to a new level of socio-economic and political prosperity.

There have been reports that Obasanjo is in support of two northern governors to run as President in 2015.

Of the two, Governor Sule Lamido of Jigawa State recently told Vanguard that he was flattered by the link of his name with the 2015 job. He did not deny nor confirm the claim.

The man he was touted to be running with, Gov. Rotimi Amaechi ofRiversState, has however openly denied having any presidential ambition. “I’m not running with Sule Lamido,” the governor was quoted as saying in the heat of the controversy.










Source - Vanguard News

Parties slam INEC’s bid for more powers

LAGOS — The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and the country’s leading opposition political parties were yesterday sharply divided over proposals for electoral reform submitted by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to the Senate.

While opposition parties flayed the commission for failing to utilize its existing powers to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process, the PDP blasted opponents of the reforms proposed by INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega as enemies of the state.
The Action Congress of Nigeria, ACN, and the Congress for Progressive Change, CPC, were joined in their opposition to the proposals for the reform of the electoral process by stakeholders in the civil rights community.

INEC had on Monday submitted its proposals on electoral reform with suggestions for the amendment of the electoral act and the constitution to increase the autonomy of the commission, to empower it to disqualify candidates in elections andprovide stiffer punishment for electoral offenders. The INEC proposal forwarded to the Senate also wants an amendment of the constitution to allow Diaspora voting.

While supporting the reforms, the PDP, however, sidestepped commenting on the demand by Jega for the electoral commission to be given the power of disqualifying candidates saying the party would behave like a dutiful player and not dabble into the “uniform of the referee.”

Besides the PDP, the ACN and CPC, constitutional lawyer Prof. Itse Sagay, civil rights activist Bamidele Aturu, founder of the Odua Peoples Congress, Dr. Fredrick Fasehun, and two former members of the House of Representatives, Eseme Eyiboh and Dr. Junaid Mohammed, reacted to the proposal.

INEC should face its roles— ACN

The ACN speaking through its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed said:

“INEC should face its primary responsibility which is creating the necessary environment for a free and fair election. It should concern itself with the logistic problems of election, the issue of qualification or disqualification of a candidate is between these two bodies, the constitution on one hand and the courts on the other. INEC has so much to do that I think that it is evident that they don’t know about the responsibilities before them that I think they want to dabble into the issue of qualification or no qualification. The constitution is very clear on who can contest election.

“The laws are there for eligibility and so long as the party conforms with the extant laws , it is not the responsibility of the INEC. INEC cannot usurp the responsibilities of the parties and the courts at the same time. They cannot even do what they are supposed to do, which is to guarantee free and fair election and they still want to dabble into qualification. What do they know about qualification?”

Alhaji Mohammed also dismissed proposals from the commission more severe sanctions for electoral cheats asking:
”Who are the electoral cheats? Are they not INEC people? Is it possible for you to commit an electoral offence without INEC, police and the security conniving?”

CPC slams INEC proposal

Faulting the proposals submitted by INEC to the Senator Ike Ekweremadu-led Senate Committee on Constitution Review, SCRC, the CPC in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Engr. Rotimi Fashakin said:

“Warts and all, does Professor Jega believe that more powers even to disqualify candidates is the immediate need for him to function as an electoral umpire? It is utterly not correct! Without mincing words, with the current arrangement, Prof Jega shall only transform into the clobber man for the President, being the appointive authority.

“What is still maintaining some modicum of sanity in our electoral system is that the power to disqualify candidates is vested in the Courts. If the truth must be said, Prof Jega has not used his position well as an unbiased umpire. For instance, how many times did the Courts overturn the candidates that Jega’s INEC imposed on CPC? Succinctly put, this proposal by Jega’s INEC should be jettisoned unreservedly,” Fashakin said in an SMS toVanguard last night.

Aturu, Junaid, others react

Rights activist and lawyer, Mr Bamidele Aturu also faulted the INEC move, saying the move by INEC will not takeNigeriaany where as far as election matters are concerned.

“My position is that, let us do credible elections, let us use the existing laws to jail those who rig elections. Advocating fancy punishment, such as INEC is doing, is not going to take us anyway. At the end of the day, it is how we enforce the law that matters. If we enforce all the laws that we have on election riggers, I think people will no longer rig. What is important is that let us do our elections credibly and use the existing laws to deal with those who rig elections.”

Fiery social critic, Dr. Junaid Mohammed also sharply disagreed with the INEC position saying: “I believe Professor Attahiru Jega should not be given such powers. Why? Jega governs an institution whose identity is unknown and when he was nominated to take over INEC, I raised an issue that he was partisan. Jega in the past had wanted to be a Minister, a Senator, so he cannot claim not to be partisan.

“Professor Jega cannot claim to be non-partisan, he has shown that the INEC he leads is not an independent umpire, so giving him such powers would have given the ruling PDP more powers at the forthcoming elections as majority of the INEC staff are card carrying members of the PDP”,Mohammed a member of the Second Republic House of Representatives said yesterday.

Speaking in the same vein, Eseme Eyiboh, also a former member of the House of Representatives asserted that INEC and its officials were essentially the cog in the wheel of the electoral process.

He argued that the commission should not be given the power to disqualify candidates.

On voting rights for Nigerians in the Diaspora, the former lawmaker said: “I don’t have any problem with Nigerians in the Diaspora voting. The problem is when people at home are disenfranchised is it when you include people abroad that you will enfranchise everyone? I think it is another way to have more voters than what we have in the voters’ register.”

The criticisms against the proposals were pooh-poohed by the PDP which claimed that anyone opposed to severe punishment for election cheats was an enemy of the newNigeriabeing fashioned by the PDP federal administration.

Speaking through its National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, the PDP said: “The PDP supports severe punishment for electoral offenders because the president has already said that one of his legacies would be democratic rights and free and fair elections. So, anybody that participates in electoral fraud, forgery or rigging of votes should be dealt with severely. The party completely supports the view of the president that we should have free and fair elections. So, anybody that talks against it is an enemy of the state and should be dealt with severely.”

“In the case of autonomy of INEC we will allow the National Assembly to deal with it. We have every confidence and faith in the National Assembly as presently constituted to handle the matter.”

Constitutional lawyer, Professor Itse Sagay welcomed the proposals on punishment for electoral cheats and Diaspora voting, but was, however, cautious on the INEC request for power to disqualify candidates.

“For as long as there is provision for the INEC decision on disqualification to be challenged in court, there is nothing wrong with it,” Sagay said yesterday.

Founder of the OPC, Dr. Fasehun also endorsed the INEC requests for Diaspora voting and sanctioning of electoral offenders. He, however, said that a 10 year ban on electoral cheats was too light and suggested at least a 20 year ban because according to him, electoral offence is a major act of corruption.

“On the case of banning electoral offenders, 10 years is too small. They should be banned for at least 20 years. If we are serious about fighting corruption, we should go the whole hog. Infringing our electoral law is utmost corruption. Those guilty of electoral offences should be given maximum punishment.”







Source - Vanguard News

50bn won’t be enough for infrastructure – FCT minister


ABUJA — MINISTER of the Federal Capital Territory Administration, FCTA, Senator Bala Mohammed, yesterday, told Senators that the Park and Pay policy recently introduced in the nation’s capital where owners of vehicles park and pay was not backed by law.

The FCT recently made it mandatory for commuters who use the roads especially in places like in Garki, Wuse, Maitama, Asokoro to pay N50 for 30 minutes, N100 for one hour and more depending on the hours one must have parked his or her vehicle.

After a serious session, yesterday, with the Senator Smart Adeyemi, PDP, Kogi West-led Senate Committee on the FCT to defend the 2013 budget, the FCT Minister, however, dared the lawmakers, boasting that no law can stop him from demolishing 31 estates and Mpape in the FCT.
FCT Minister, Senator Bala Mohammed going through a social housing brochure by American Building Systems International with former US Ambassador to Nigeria, Ms Robin Sanders when she paid a courtesy call on the Minister to discuss housing development ….Friday
When asked if there was any law backing the introduction of park and pay policy in the FCT, the minister said: “The parking regime, we inherited it and we saw that it is noble and we implemented it. We are treating it administratively.

“There is no institutional structure at all. It is just a responsibility of the road department to make sure that all these practices where the city is converted into a car park. We have designated car parks here and there, people park anyhow such that the corridors are impeded by people who do not want to follow our transport resolutions and that is why it was done by my predecessor and I saw that it is a good thing.

“Even the Okada, we don’t have a law but we are treating it administratively because security is everybody’s business. If we allow all these things to happen, certainly we will end up in trouble and we just have to take pre-emptive measures. I have a law on demolishing.

The law I said I don’t have is the one the chairman asked on the issue of parking. But for demolition, I have the law and I don’t even have to interfere with Development Control Law under the Land Use Act.”

The FCT Minister noted that N50,000,000,000 budget ceiling for the FCT by the Budget Office of the Federation as 2013 National Priority budget will not be enough to provide the needed infrastructure for the city. He said 2012 budget based on analysis, stands at 99 per cent, adding that total payment made up till date stands at N31.7 billion while the balance of N496 million is under process.

In the budget breakdown, the FCT will next year build a cultural centre and Millennium Tower for N2 billion, just as besides the N1 billion earmarked for construction of Vice President Namadi Sambo’s residence in Aso Drive, it will now be completed for N2 billion.

On demolition, Mohammed said: ‘’I want to ,with all respect and humility , tell the Chairman that this is not true. Since I came, I am not aware of any conversion that we have done and we have the coordinator of Abuja Metropolitan Management Council.

‘’People are free to think anyhow out of mischief and treachery and they will be ringing issues to the highest level of government up to the Senate. I too, I have had occasion to discuss to in the Senate that there are some of this information that are not true and as a Senate I will ask you to investigate and find out.

‘’If there are hills being bulldozed maybe they are part of the development of the Master Plan and it is not true that all hills are not being developed. If you go to some countries they are all on hills. So it is not every hill that should be left out. Some hills are meant to be removed and we have some areas which we call buffer zones and we have to bulldoze some buildings.

I must say with all humility at the risk of sounding impudent that there is some lot of practice of impunity prevalent in our city where people take it for granted.

‘’Some of those estates that you said we have not given notice, we can give you evidence when you come when right from the foundation we have been telling the developer ‘don’t do it. This place is designed. It is not your own plot. You have not even obtained Development Control approval. Yet they will go ahead and develop and you expect us to leave them to practice that impunity thinking that will go through the corrupt system and get it regularize.

‘’Certainly we will not allow the business of government to be extricated by this type of unwholesome attitude. And it is with all humility that we do demolition. It is not because we like it. It is not the moral issue but the moral baggage is also on the society to know that government is just a service to them and if they continue to abuse it certainly we have to take the remedial measures in terms of enforcement and we do enforcement after persuasion.

‘’Not just going with the big hammer to start killing the fly but we normally give all the information and in particular cases of the expense we will give you all the information that you require. We are in court. We don’t want to pre-empt the outcome of the court but certainly we will not allow the huge investment made by the federal government for the last 35 years to the tune of N3 or N4trillion to be destroyed by the wishful interest of some few individuals who are just using the media and using some offices of government to blackmail us. we are not doing it for ourselves, we are doing it out of absolute responsibility.

‘’Development control is just a government office. We don’t have power of enforcement. We use the police sometimes we use the military but people don’t listen and like you said we will want more capacity to be built. In the Mass Housing area, when it was started, it was about four to five district and we did not have the capacity for oversight but now we are really building with the support that we are getting from you. You can see in our statutory budget all this things captured so that we can have more in terms of enforcement.

‘’But certainly as you said we are not just allowing it to grow until it reach a level then we come and start demolishing. At every stage we give notice ‘please stop.’ But when they refuse to stop and we don’t have capacity to go and stop them from the onset unless they refuse to it then we now know that yes, these people mean business and we have demolished and we are in court and we will plead with you to allow us exercise our statutory responsibilities over all these duties and of course since it is in court so that it will not pre-empt what is going on.”

When asked by the Senators on efforts he was making to ensure that houses were not demolished without the backing of the law, the Minister roared, ‘’Which law? Which law are you asking for? We have the responsibility to enforce the Master Plan. The FCDA has a law and the Abuja Master Plan is not compromising.”

When a member of the Committee, Senator Domingo Obende reminded him thus, ‘’Hon Minister you just said to us that you don’t have a law, the FCT Minister replied saying, ‘’I have a law for demolishing.

The law I said I don’t have is the one the chairman asked on the issue of parking. But for demolishing I have the law and I don’t even have to interfere with Development Control law under the Land Use Act.”

On whether he was going ahead with the demolition with the estates, he said, ‘’You see two wrongs do not make a right and for us to allow an exclusion of an exercise of impunity or lawlessness, we are not going to condone this for any reason. They have given a lot of sentiments as a politician, I am a civil servant. We have to go through the process.

‘’People are going wrong. It is just like theMalaysianGarden. People’s money have been collected to build estate on over 500 hectares in the last seven years. Coming back to the issue of the 31 estates, most Nigerians are gullible. Unfortunately when the accelerated development programme was put in place, there were no guidelines.

‘’We are supposed to know the timeline for delivery. We are supposed to put on sight primary infrastructure and prototype for people to know that this is a building they are going to get, within certain period based on the agreement. But Nigerians were just paying. The same thing happened to the 31 estates. What we are saying is that we are going to give alternative to those developers.

After all, most of them have not gone very far and again for Nigerians that are trying to get affordable housing, we are coming with estates, an American investor has come and even our own Abuja Property Development Company is going to build about 100 hectares and my colleague is developing a district so that we bring houses to the threshold of affordability by Nigerians who may not afford these high brow areas. And again, even in Mpape where we are demolishing, we want to build social and affordable houses within the precincts of the city.

‘’Yes, we have already demolished some portions and we have done enumeration after going through all the processes.

That place is just a large and big encroachment because of the economic activities arising from the quarry activities.

Even the quarries we intend to move them out of that place because we have provided some quarry areas within the Master Plan. But certainly this is a long time measure. We have been stopped by our principal so that we can do persuasion, we can carry them along but certainly we are not going to leave them because if you leave them this Chamber is not safe because of the security information that we got.

‘’So we have to carry on not because we want to do it but certainly we are going to make sure that we provide palliation. Those whose buildings are going to be demolished, we will make sure they get alternative from the developments that are going to be in that place or in other portions of the city. Essentially what I am saying is that we have a moral bargain.Abujathe way it was structured is such that right from the onset it did not take into cognizance the needs of the common people especially the lower cadre of the civil servants and supporting staff. Most of them are left out in the buildings and in the Master Plan.

‘’That is why we have a show of plan-lessness from Nyanya up to Keffi and of course, on the other precincts of the city. But it is not today that we are going to effect a change. Of course, Mr. President is bringing transformation and we are building affordable mass housing.”







Source - Vanguard News

Festival: Lagos blames unregistered athletes for meal shortage


Team FCT taking on Team Niger in the women’s basketball event ...on Tuesday
The Chairman Catering Sub-committee of the 18th National Sports Festival, Segun Daodu, on Tuesday said the alleged shortage of food for athletes and officials at the ongoing games was caused by some states, whom he claimed brought in more athletes than they registered for the festival.

There have been widespread complaints by athletes and officials alike over their inability to get food at the designated venues.

But Daodu said they prepared for the number of athletes and officials submitted by the states to the Main Organising Committee of the festival.

He said a decision had been taken to send unaccredited athletes away from the hostels.

Daodu said at the Kofo Aina Ademola Hall, University of Lagos, “Every state has a specific number of athletes and officials that are to be taken care of, which was approved by the MOC but unfortunately, some states brought more than the numbers registered with the MOC.

“It is this same number that was passed to us at the LOC. In a meeting with the MOC and all Directors of Sports from all the states, it was resolved that any athlete without accreditation and meal ticket should vacate the hostel so that we can concentrate on the true athletes.”

However, an athlete from a northern state, who claimed anonymity, said she was accredited but also had problems in getting her meals at the right time.

“You can see my accreditation as an athlete but I had to buy food outside for some days. Sometimes when you go to where they told us to eat, they will tell you food is finished. Sometimes you get food in the morning, you won’t be served for the rest of the day. There were some athletes who couldn’t eat for a whole day,” she said.










Source - Punch News

Heads will roll over SARS office attack – IG


acting Inspector-General of Police, Mr. Mohammed Abubakar
Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Abubakar, has warned that any police officers found culpable in the attack on the FCT Special Anti-Robbery Squad office would be fired.

The IG said “heads will roll” in the SARS should any officer be indicted in the on-going investigations into the terrorist attack that claimed the lives of two policemen and the escape of unknown number of crime suspects.

About 40 gunmen, suspected to be terrorists, attacked the SARS office in Abuja on November 26 and released a number of detainees from the detention facility.

Abubakar had set up a high-power panel headed by an Assistant Inspector-General of Police to investigate the incident which embarrassed the police authorities and led to speculation that the attack could not have taken place without an insider’s collaboration.

The IG told journalists in Abuja during his visit to the Federal Capital Territory Police Command, that once investigations into the incident were concluded, the next line of action would be determined.

He said, “We are not resting on the issue of the attack on SARS Headquarters. We are still investigating and once we conclude, we will take the necessary actions but l can tell you, heads will roll in SARS.”

On his visit to the FCT command, Abubakar said he wanted to personally assess the preparedness of the command to ensure safety of life and property in the territory.

He assured the police personnel in the command of the Federal Government’s commitment to permanently address problems associated with police pension.

Abubakar said the welfare of the police would be regularly reviewed to enable them to focus on the duties of securing the society.

The IG warned that the police authorities would punish errant officers and men who fail in their duties of protecting life and property.

IG urged officers, especially the Divisional Police Officers to be open and courteous in dealing with the public, insisting that police stations should be open to all and sundry.

He said, “Police station is a public place, you must allow people to see you, you must be able to see people, you are there to help the public and you cannot do so if you are difficult to access.

“I appeal to all of us to try and imbibe this change that we are all talking about in this country, this change must take place in the police force.’’

Abubakar also stressed the need for synergy among the security agencies in the country, noting that the collaboration would help in dealing with emerging societal challenges.

Meanwhile, the Minister of State for Defence, Mrs. Olusola Obada, said the Federal Government would be willing to hold talks with the Islamic sect, Boko Haram, in the quest to find lasting solution to insecurity in the country.

Obada said negotiation with the sect had not taken place because the leaders of the group responsible for the incidents of bombing in the country were not known.

Obada spoke when the Canadian High Commissioner to Nigeria, Mr. Chris Cooter, and the Defence Attache to Nigeria, Col. J G Savard, paid a courtesy call on her office in Abuja on Tuesday.

The Minister also said it was the desire of the Federal Government to ensure that the violence in the northern part of the country was brought under control and eradicated completely.

She said President Goodluck Jonathan and indeed the Federal Government would opt to negotiate with the members of the sect whenever the need came up.

She added that the country would be grateful for whatever assistance the Canadian government could render in the fight against terrorism and insecurity in the country.

She said, “We shall be very happy if you can assist in the area of training our troops, and also some other forms of assistance that you could give which I would talk to you about. We are hoping that all these things would become a thing of the past.

“Much as we desire to bring this under control, to eradicate it, we also believe that if these people are known, there is nothing stopping us from dialoguing with them.

“But for now, we don’t know them. But I can assure you that the President and the government are not averse to bringing peace to the country and if the need arises, we shall engage them in dialogue; we are not closing that option of dialogue.”

The Canadian High Commissioner said his country recognised the importance of Africa and the strategic role being played by the country in the sub region especially in Mali where efforts were on to reclaim territories captured by militant groups.

He stated that the establishment of bi-national commission between Canada and Nigeria had resulted in increased cooperation between both countries in security, politics and economic issues.










Source - Punch News

Mursi flees presidential palace as protest grows


Egyptian President, Muhammad Mursi
Egyptian police battled thousands of protesters outside President Mohamed Mursi’s palace in Cairo on Tuesday, prompting the Islamist leader to leave the building, presidency sources said.

Officers fired teargas at up to 10,000 demonstrators angered by Mursi’s drive to hold a referendum on a new constitution on December 15. Some broke through police lines around his palace and protested next to the perimeter wall.

The crowds had gathered nearby in what organisers had dubbed “last warning” protests against Mursi, who infuriated opponents with a November 22 decree that expanded his powers. “The people want the downfall of the regime,” the demonstrators chanted.

“The president left the palace,” a presidential source, who declined to be named, told Reuters. A security source at the presidency also said the president had departed.

Mursi ignited a storm of unrest in his bid to prevent a judiciary still packed with appointees of ousted predecessor Hosni Mubarak from derailing a troubled political transition.

Facing the gravest crisis of his six-month-old tenure, the Islamist president has shown no sign of buckling under pressure.

Riot police at the palace faced off against activists chanting “leave, leave” and holding Egyptian flags with “no to the constitution” written on them. Protesters had assembled near mosques in northern Cairo before marching towards the palace.

“Our marches are against tyranny and the void constitutional decree and we won’t retract our position until our demands are met,” said Hussein Abdel Ghany, a spokesman for an opposition coalition of liberal, leftist and other disparate factions.

Protesters later surrounded the palace, with some climbing on gates at the rear to look down into the gardens.

At one point, people clambered onto a police armored vehicle and waved flags, while riot police huddled nearby.

The Health Ministry said 18 people had been injured in clashes next to the palace, according to the state news agency.

Despite the latest protests, there has been only a limited response to opposition calls for a mass campaign of civil disobedience in the Arab world’s most populous country and cultural hub, where many people yearn for a return to stability.

A few hundred protesters gathered earlier near Mursi’s house in a suburb east of Cairo, chanting slogans against his decree and against the Muslim Brotherhood, from which the president emerged to win a free election in June. Police closed the road to stop them from coming any closer, a security official said.

Opposition groups have accused Mursi of making a dictatorial power grab to push through a constitution drafted by an assembly dominated by his supporters, with a referendum planned for December 15.

They say the draft constitution does not reflect the interests of Egypt’s liberals and other groups, an accusation dismissed by Islamists who insist it is a balanced document.

Egypt’s most widely-read independent newspapers did not publish on Tuesday in protest at Mursi’s “dictatorship”. Banks closed early to let staff go home safely in case of trouble.

Abdelrahman Mansour in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the cradle of the anti-Mubarak revolt, said: “The presidency believes the opposition is too weak and toothless. Today is the day we show them the opposition is a force to be reckoned with.”

But after winning post-Mubarak elections and pushing the Egyptian military out of the political driving seat it held for decades, the Islamists sense their moment has come to shape the future of Egypt, a longtime US ally whose 1979 peace treaty with Israel is a cornerstone of Washington’s Middle East policy.

The Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, who staged a huge pro-Mursi rally in Cairo on Saturday, are confident enough members of the judiciary will be available to oversee the mid-December referendum, despite calls by some judges for a boycott.

“The crisis we have suffered for two weeks is on its way to an end, and very soon, God willing,” Saad al-Katatni, leader of the Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party, told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.








Source - Punch News

Jonathan cautions aides against attacking Obasanjo


President Goodluck Jonathan
President Goodluck Jonathan has directed his aides to stop the media war against former President Olusegun Obasanjo with a warning that any aide that errs will lose his job.

The PUNCH learnt in Abuja that the presidential directive came on the heels of intervention by some unnamed chieftains of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party. The party lords were said to have asked the President to caution his aides.

A Presidency source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said some members of the party felt that the exchange of words between the President, his aides and the former President was not good for the image of the party.

The source said, “The party informed the President that the members of the opposition could capitalise on the disagreement to cause a major friction between the two leaders of the party.

“The President has directed his aides not to speak either directly or indirectly on anything that is injurious to the former President on any issue. This is because some leaders of the PDP have advised him not to take on the former President in a fight.

“Apart from the political implication of such, we also believe that it could heat up the polity and cause tension in both the party and the polity.

“Moreover, the party has seen that the opposition is already trying to make gains from the fight and that will not be a good thing either for the two leaders or our party.

“The President respects Obasanjo. He will not do anything that will widen the gap between them. I am sure that the disagreement will be settled.

“Besides, there are no plans by the President to witch-hunt Obasanjo with any probe.”

A member of the National Working Committee of the party, who spoke with selected journalists in Abuja on Sunday, said the party was worried about the increasing animosity between the two senior members of the party.

Obasanjo was the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the PDP until April this year when he resigned his appointment.

Obasanjo stirred a hornet’s nest recently when he gave an indication that Jonathan might be a weak leader because of the way he had been handling the security challenges facing the country.

The former President said he directed the security agencies to fish out the militants who killed some security men in Odi, Rivers State, during his tenure as President.

Jonathan however used the occasion of his Media Chat to respond to Obasanjo’s comment, saying the invasion of Odi during Obasanjo’s presidency did not solve the problem.

Rather, he said, innocent lives were lost as the security operatives did not succeed in killing the militants that were suspected to have killed the security men.










Source - Punch News

Reps order Oteh’s delegation out of revenue meetin


Director-General, Securities and Exchange Commission, Ms. Arunma Oteh
In a move to enforce its resolution on the Securities and Exchange Commission, the House of Representatives on Tuesday walked out officials of the agency from a meeting at the National Assembly.

The three-man SEC delegation had gone to represent the Director-General of the commission, Ms. Arunma Oteh, at an interactive session with Ministries, Departments and Agencies.

The House, following its investigation into the near collapse of the capital market, asked President Goodluck Jonathan to sack Oteh on the grounds that her appointment was illegal.

The President has not complied with the resolution.

The House responded by passing another resolution not to recognise Oteh as the DG of SEC or having anything to do with the commission so long as she remained the DG.

Tuesday’s session, organised by the House Committee on Finance, was to find ways of plugging the leakages in the revenue generated by MDAs and the non-remittance of such funds to the Federation Account/Consolidated Revenue Fund of Government.

As the committee Chairman, Mr. Abdulmumini Jibrin, took a roll call of the MDAs present, he called the head of SEC but remarked that the agency was not supposed to be invited.

He said, “SEC was invited in error. As you are aware, the House does not have any dealings with you at the moment.

“Please, pack your documents and excuse us.”

In 2008, the sixth Assembly had conducted a similar investigation into non-remittance of revenues to government by MDAs.

The report of the investigation showed that MDAs kept as much as N3tn revenue to themselves between 1999 and 2007.

But, another outcome of the investigation was the argument of the MDAs that they were empowered by their enabling Acts to generate and spend the revenue on services they rendered.

On Tuesday, Jibrin said they had resolved to amend the Acts of all the agencies to bring them in conformity with the constitution.

Jibrin explained that the amendments would take out the clauses that allow the agencies to declare only surpluses “instead of remitting the gross revenue generated to government”.

The Speaker of the House, Mr. Aminu Tambuwal, in an address, said agencies that spend money without appropriation by the National Assembly were in breach of the constitution.

Tambuwal, who was represented by his Deputy, Emeka Ihedioha, quoted Section 162 of the constitution to buttress his point.

Meanwhile, about 18 of the 62 agencies did not attend the session on Tuesday.

The committee gave them 24 hours to respond to the invitation or they would risk sanctions, including the arrest of the heads of such MDAs.

Among the agencies were the Nigerian Communications Commission, Central Bank of Nigeria, Nigerian Ports Authority, Asset Management Company of Nigeria, Nigerian Customs Service, Standard Organisation of Nigeria, Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria and Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority.










Source - Punch News

FG spends N9bn annually on 10-aircraft presidential fleet


President Goodluck Jonathan
INFORMATION obtained from government aviation agencies and airline operators has revealed that President Goodluck Jonathan-led administration spends an estimated N9.08bn annually on the Presidential Air Fleet.

PAF has the third largest fleet of aircraft in the country. According to findings, the PAF contains a total of 10 aircraft, coming closely behind Aerocontractors Airlines, which has a total of 14 aircraft.

Arik Air, the largest commercial airline in the country, has a fleet of 23 aircraft.

Figures obtained from the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency, Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria, and the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority revealed that N9.08bn is spent to maintain the 10 presidential jets every year.

The PAF include two Falcon 7X jets, two Falcon 900 jets, Gulfstream 550, one Boeing 737 BBJ (Nigerian Air Force 001 or Eagle One), and Gulfstream IVSP.

Others are one Gulfstream V, Cessna Citation 2 aircraft and Hawker Siddley 125-800 jet.

Cost of running fleet

According to a former Minister of Information, Professor, Dora Akunyili, each of the two Falcon 7X jets purchased in 2010 cost $51.1m, while the Gulfstream 550 costs $53.3m.

The factory price of other aircraft in the fleet could not be easily obtained online. However, airline CEOs put the average price of Falcon 900 at $35m, Gulfstream IVSP as $40m, Gulfstream V at $45m, Boeing 737 BBJ at $58m, Cessna Citation is $7m and Hawker Siddley 125-800 at $15m.

This brings a combined estimated value of Nigeria’s PAF to $390.5m (N60.53bn).

According to airline chief executives and industry experts, airlines spend between 15 and 20 per cent of the cost of an aircraft on its operation yearly. They say that averagely, a little less than one-fifth of the cost of the plane is spent every year on insurance, flight and cabin crew, maintenance, fuelling, catering and training.

Going by the fact that at least 15 per cent of this amount is spent annually on operating the PAF, it means about $58.57m (N9.08bn ) is spent annually on running the planes .

Nigeria happens to be one of few countries of the world with a large PAF.

Other countries’ fleets

Most major countries in Europe and Asia maintain mostly two aircraft in their Presidential Air Fleet, according to Wikipedia.

According to the website, Japan maintains only two Boeing 747-400 planes in its Presidential Air Fleet.

The two aircraft, mostly for the Prime Minister, the Emperor, Empress and other members of the Imperial Family, is operated by the Japan Air Self-Defence Force.

The aircraft were constructed at the Boeing factory at the same time as the United States’ Air Force One. Both Japanese aircraft were delivered in 1990.

Wikipedia also confirms that the Netherlands government operates only two aircraft, one Fokker 70 and one Gulfstream IV, as a means of transport for the Dutch Royal family and government officials, such as the prime minister and other ministers.

They are also used also to attend international conferences, and also for private trips by the Queen and the Prince of Orange.

For long haul trips the Royal Dutch Airline is used. Often the upper deck of a Boeing 747 is used.

The Queen of England and Prime Minister David Cameron often go on British Airways chartered flights for long trips. UK’s Cameron was recently criticised by the UK media for chartering a foreign plane instead of a British’s.

According to Wikipedia, The Royal Squadron of the Royal Air Force maintains a fleet of Agusta A109 helicopters, BAE-125 mid-sized business jet and BAE-146 regional airliner to support short travel by the Royal Family, the Prime Minister and senior members of the British Government.

Countries like Ghana, Algeria and a host of others in Europe maintain only one aircraft in their PAF.

Domestic airlines

The latest revelation on Nigeria’s PAF size is coming amid dearth of aircraft among domestic airlines, which lack adequate finance to buy more planes to meet up with the soaring domestic passenger capacity.

Apart from Arik Air and Aero, each of the remaining domestic airlines does not possess even half of the number of aircraft in the PAF, according to findings by our correspondent.

IRS Airlines has only four operational aircraft in its fleet; Dana Air has four aircraft; Firstnation, three aircraft; and Medview Airlines, two aircraft; figures obtained from the industry revealed.

In recent months, domestic travellers have been scrambling to get air tickets due to lack of capacity on the part of the other local airlines, after the suspension of operations by Dana Air, Air Nigeria and FirstNation Airlines respectively.

Apart from Arik and Aero, most of the domestic airlines fell behind the PAF in terms of the number of aircraft in their fleet.

These include Air Nigeria, Dana Air, IRS Airlines, FirstNation Airlines, Medview Airlines, Overland Airways and Associated Airlines.

Airline CEOs opinions

Some airline CEOs, who pleaded anonymity, raised concerns over the economic sense behind the large mix of brands of aircraft in the President Air Fleet.

They said although the fleet size was large, the cost of operation would have been cheaper if they had maintained only two brands, instead of more.

According to them, the various brands of aircraft in the fleet will cost the Presidency more in terms of money being spent on aircraft maintenance, insurance, engineers, flight and cabin crew among others.

“If you look at the Presidential Fleet, you have at least five different brands of aircraft manufacturers. In that single Presidential Fleet, you have Boeing, Falcons, Gulfstream, Hawker and Cessna: that is not less than four different brands from various countries. I don’t know the economic sense in this. The fleet needs to be streamlined from five to just two brands. The aircraft can’t see each other. It means each of those planes will have its own flight crew, cabin crew, engineers, dispatchers etc. It is a mismatch. The Presidency will be spending more to keep all of them in the skies. Going by airline economics, you spend less when you focus on a single brand or at most two. You will get support from the manufacturers and then you spend less,” the CEO of a domestic airline, who pleaded anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the matter, told our correspondent.

“Look at IRS, it has only one brand, all its four planes are all from Fokker; look at First Nation, it has only Airbus. All its three planes are all Airbus A319. Look at Dana, all its four planes are all Boeing MD-83s. Look at Aero, It has only Boeing and Bombardier planes, just two brands. That is how to run a fleet of aircraft with economic sense. You don’t need more than two. Globally, it is the same thing. South West Airlines in USA has hundreds of planes and they are all from one single brand, Boeing. I think they need to streamline the fleet to just two brands to minimise the cost of running them. By that, there will be a reduction in the number of the crews they will be using to fly them” the CEO added.

Spokesman for the President, Mr. Reuben Abati, could not be reached for comments on the PAF. Telephone calls made to his telephone line was not picked, while a text message sent was not also replied.

PAF workforce

According to the NAF’s website, PAF’s current staff strength consists of 47 NAF officers, 173 airmen/airwomen and 96 civilian staff, both technical and administrative.

“The operational headquarters of the Fleet is located at the Presidential Wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, while the administrative personnel are at the Federal Secretariat. The fleet has a liaison office at the Presidential Villa. Flight operations, training, aircraft maintenance and general running of the fleet are funded by the Presidency,” according to the website.










Source - Punch News

Minister defends N2bn budget for Sambo’s house


Vice-President Namadi Sambo
The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Bala Mohammed, has defended the huge allocations in the 2013 Budget for the construction of houses for Vice President Namadi Sambo and other senior government officials.

Mohammed defended the allocations when he appeared before the Senate Committee on the FCT on Tuesday. He said that the territory’s N50bn budget for 2013 included a N2bn funding for the construction of the official residence of Vice President Namadi Sambo.

“The projects that will be funded under ongoing projects include the designing and construction of the residence of the Vice President; the residence of the President of the Senate and the Deputy Senate President; the Speaker and that of the Deputy Speaker,” Mohammed told the committee members.

Our correspondent who went through the estimates reported that they contained a N2bn provision for the construction of the official residence of Sambo. Also, N300m has been earmarked for the designing and construction of the residences of the President of the Senate, David Mark; his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu; the Speaker, Aminu Tambuwal; and his deputy, Emeka Ihedioha.

The Federal Executive Council had in 2009 approved a N7.1bn contract for the design and construction of a new official residence for the vice-president of Nigeria. However, Mohammed did not say how much has been expended on the building so far.

The new official residence, to be situated in the Presidential Villa in the Three Arms Zone, Abuja, was to be handled by Julius Berger Nigeria Plc and was to be completed in 20 months.

Then Minister of Information and Communications, Prof. Dora Akunyili, had announced the FEC approval of the project to journalists, saying, “Council gave approval for the award of a contract for the design and construction of the residence of the Vice-President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the Three Arms Zone, Abuja, in favour of Messrs Julius Berger Plc. with 20 months as completion period.

“The Vice-President currently resides at the Akinola Aguda House, within the precincts of the Presidential Villa, which is designed as a guest house for the President.”

Ex-minister of the FCT, Adamu Aliero, had added then that due to security considerations the contract was not awarded to Julius Berger through an open bidding process.

He had said, “We did not advertise it for security reasons because you cannot subject the house of the number two man to public scrutiny. We did what we call selective bidding. Julius Berger Nigeria Plc. was selected because of their experience in constructing the Presidential Villa and National Assembly complexes.”

Explaining why the building of a residence for the VP was considered a priority in Nigeria despite the magnitude of problems facing the citizens of the country, the minister had said, “The Vice-President is staying in a guest house meant for visiting heads of state.

“It is not right, it is not befitting for the Vice-President. The former administration decided to give the house of the Vice-President to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, which was in line with what was contained in the Abuja master plan.

“It became imperative for us to provide accommodation for the Vice-President. The Vice-President has no accommodation; certainly you will agree with me that it is unbecoming for any government not to provide accommodation for its Vice-President. We will now embark on the construction of a befitting residence for the vice-president.”

Aso Rock, seat of Nigeria’s President, just last week secured the approval of the Federal Executive Council for an additional 2.2bn bouquet hall to host ceremonies by the President.

The approval was part of the N19.4 bn contracts for this year, covering road construction, rail transportation and infrastructural development in the FCT.

The new banquet hall, according to the promoters, would have a capacity to seat 150 guests at once.

However, critics have deplored the provisions arguing that they were wasteful expenditures. There is already an existing hall in the Villa where national events are held.

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Senator Bala Muhammed, while defending the approval said that the council approved the project because smaller countries had befitting banquet halls in their seats of power.

Meanwhile, Mohammed said his administration as FCT minister was owing contractors over N26bn for work done on various projects across the city within the 2012 fiscal year.

He told the Senators that the N50bn allocated to the ministry was inadequate to meet the task of providing infrastructure in the city.

He said there would necessarily be an intervention funding, through public private partnership initiative and statutory allocation.

In the FCT budget for 2013, the National Assembly Complex Phase III, Part II and III will also gulp a total of N500m; while the provision of water facilities will cost N5.61bn.

Mohammed also told senators that the development of a rail line for Abuja would cost a total of N1.5bn in the 2013 fiscal period.

The FCTA also intends to spend N1bn for the provision of health facilities in the city within the year and another N34.13bn for the provision of sundry infrastructure within the city.

He said a total of N46.26bn was appropriated for FCTA in 2012, but only N37.30bn was received, though N31.79bn had been expended so far.

Senators, however, expressed concerns about the effects of the renewed demolition being carried out by the FCT’s Development Control Department.

Senator Smart Adeyemi, who chairs the Senate Committee on FCT, said, “I have received petitions from the public and from some of my colleagues that the FCTA is demolishing some estates. The moral question is where were your officials when these estates were being developed.

“The officials may have compromised to have allowed the buildings to reach completion stages and you are now demolishing them.

“Don’t forget that some unsuspecting Nigerians have invested in these estates; civil servants and poor people have paid monies to developers not knowing that these were not genuine; there should be something done for them as compensation.”

But Mohammed replied, “We will demolish any structure that violates the master plan of the FCT. But we will go through the processes and if we find out that such a structure does not comply with the master plan, it will be demolished.

“That is what the law says. I know as politicians you will like to bring in sentiments, but we have to face the facts and do the right thing if we must keep Abuja clean.”

“That is what the law says. I know as politicians you will like to bring in sentiments, but we have to face the facts and do the right thing if we must keep Abuja clean.”










Source - Punch News